The EU Whistleblowing Directive requires secure reporting and whistleblower protection across entities and countries. Whispli helps organisations meet these obligations with a compliant, defensible framework.
.svg%20(1).avif){kind=logo}
.webp){kind=logo}
.webp){kind=logo}
.webp)
Support compliance with core requirements of Directive (EU) 2019/1937, including secure internal reporting channels, acknowledgement of receipt within statutory deadlines and timely, documented follow-up.
Ensure strict protection of the identity of reporting persons and third parties, in line with Article 16 of the Directive, supported by appropriate technical and organisational measures under GDPR. This includes safeguards against retaliation and compliance with the Directive’s reversal of the burden of proof requirements in retaliation cases.
Apply defined procedures for assessment, investigation and follow-up, with documented actions to demonstrate fairness, consistency and compliance during audits or disputes.
Support implementation across EU Member States, taking into account national transpositions, labour law requirements and enforcement expectations.
%201.svg)
Provide secure internal reporting channels that meet the requirements set out in Article 8 of Directive (EU) 2019/1937, including controlled access, confidentiality safeguards and availability for eligible reporting persons across the organisation.
%202.svg)
Support follow-up obligations as defined in Article 9 by enabling secure two-way communication with reporting persons, allowing additional information to be requested and feedback to be provided while preserving confidentiality and, where applicable, anonymity.
Ensure acknowledgement of receipt and follow-up actions are tracked in line with Directive deadlines, including the requirement to acknowledge reports within seven days and provide feedback within the prescribed timeframe, with time-stamped evidence of compliance.
Apply strict technical and organisational measures to protect the identity of reporting persons and any third parties mentioned in reports, in accordance with Article 16, limiting access to authorised persons only and preventing unauthorised disclosure.
%202.svg)
Maintain clear documentation of assessment, investigation and follow-up steps to demonstrate fair and diligent handling of reports, supporting compliance in the event of audits, disputes or enforcement actions.
%201.svg)
Enable group-level implementation of whistleblowing procedures across EU entities, while allowing adaptation to national transpositions of the Directive and local labour law requirements.
Organisations can evidence alignment with Directive (EU) 2019/1937, including compliant reporting channels, confidentiality safeguards, statutory timelines and documented follow-up.
Clear procedures, traceability and identity protection reduce exposure to sanctions, litigation and challenges related to retaliation, procedural flaws or data protection breaches.
Time-stamped records and structured case handling support inspections, audits and reviews by regulators, labour authorities, courts or internal audit functions.
More than 300 companies, organisations and education institutions rely on Whispli to run their global speak-up programmes.
Whispli has been deployed in over 60 countries, demonstrating its flexibility and ease of configuration.
With no language barriers, Whispli empowers everyone to speak up confidently.
Move from fragmented reporting tools to a single system of record designed for the realities of 2026.
Talk to our compliance experts and strengthen your global governance while uncovering risks before they escalate.
The Directive applies to private sector organisations with 50 or more employees and to all public sector entities. Certain obligations may also apply to smaller organisations depending on national transposition and sector-specific regulations.
Organisations must acknowledge receipt of a report within seven days and provide feedback on follow-up actions within a reasonable timeframe not exceeding three months, unless otherwise specified by national law.
Yes, provided the system allows compliance with national transpositions, local procedural requirements and appropriate delegation of handling responsibilities while maintaining group-level governance and oversight.
Failure to comply may result in administrative sanctions, reputational damage, challenges to investigations, litigation related to retaliation or procedural flaws, and adverse findings during audits or regulatory reviews.
%201.avif)
%201%20(2).avif)
%201%20(1).avif)
